There are a few things about A. Abimbola Adelakun article on
September 19, 2013 titled “Rochas’ abortion law should stay” that has compelled
me to write this response. Large parts of it contained disturbing language,
sentiments and soundbites that have long been used by professional and career
pro-abortion campaigners to advocate for a procedure that even by her
acknowledgement has a terrible physical and psychological effect on women. It
hovered around the peripheral issues concerning the politics of abortion
playing out in most countries, appealed to emotion and even delved into
religion whilst expertly ignoring the “mighty elephant in the room”. This has
always been the “modus operandi” of career abortionist.
Before I go ahead to deconstruct her arguments, I think it
is important to deal with this “proverbial elephant”. When it comes to
abortion, it is sometimes necessary to leave the politics out and deal with the
substance. What we are talking about here is the Sanctity of Human Life, the
rights accorded it and at what stage. Let me state three facts at this point.
Firstly, human life begins from the moment of conception. None of us can point
to any other moment other than conception and say “that is when I began to be
me”. Abimbola did not tell us when human life actually begins. As human beings,
it is important not to deny that our physical development at our present age is
not the same when we were teenagers, adolescents, infants, babies or foetuses.
Even the word Foetus which comes from the Latin word Fetura –ae, f means a
young brood or offspring. We all started
(me and you) as one. ‘We are who we are now, physically, because we developed
from what we used to be’. Once conception has taken place and an embryo is
formed, if you give it time, let’s say 9 months or 28 years, the only other
thing it could be is an infant or adult respectively. It cannot be something
else, ever!
Secondly, in a civilized society, Human Life should be
preserved, protected and nurtured from the point of conception to its natural
end. Finally, every human life is bestowed with certain inalienable ‘rights’,
the foremost amongst them: THE RIGHT TO LIFE. Any argument that doesn’t address
these three premises directly would be begging the question. This was what made
her article the more frustrating because at no point did she make any attempt
to address any of these which is very crucial to the moral issue surrounding
abortion, but was happy to dance around its politics –left vs. right, liberals
vs. conservatives. Let’s forget this ideological label for once and face moral
question of abortion. Being prolife is much of a leftist position as it is a
conservative stance. It was Medhi Hassan who once wrote in an article for the
Newstatesman:
here
“Abortion is one of those rare political issues on which left and right
seem to have swapped ideologies: right-wingers talk of equality, human rights
and “defending the innocent”, while left-wingers fetishise “choice”,
selfishness and unbridled individualism.
“My body, my life, my choice.” Such rhetoric has always left me
perplexed. Isn’t socialism about protecting the weak and vulnerable, giving a
voice to the voiceless? Who is weaker or more vulnerable than the unborn child?
Which member of our society needs a voice more than the mute baby in the womb?
Yes, a woman has a right to choose what to do with her body – but a
baby isn’t part of her body. The 24-week-old foetus can’t be compared with an
appendix, a kidney or a set of tonsils; it makes no sense to dismiss it as a
“clump of cells” or a “blob of protoplasm”. However, my motive for writing this
column is not merely to revisit ancient arguments, or kick off a philosophical
debate on the distinctions between socialism (with its emphasis on equality,
solidarity and community) and liberalism (with its focus on individual freedom,
autonomy and choice) …”
Let’s deal with the question of “choice” that is always
bandied about by career abortionist. It might sound counter intuitive, but I am
all for choice (i.e I am prochoice) and individuals acting freely, but as I
have mentioned on another forum “When the term a ‘right to choose’ is used, it
speaks to its very essence: the question of freedom. Even common law grants us
this very essential faculty, but as in common law, this freedom is not absolute.
This usually becomes clear when it involves two or more people. As a result,
society has a mechanism to ensure the balancing of the very exercise of this
freedom. To choose implies that there is more than one alternative. “So, if I
am free to choose from more than one alternative why stop me from choosing in
this case?” you may ask. Well, society has the responsibility to balance rights
in order to ensure a sense of justice, equity, but more crucially to all facets
of human society; to a sense of what is Right.
Make no mistake about this, when a woman is pregnant, the ‘rights’ of
two (or more in the case of twins…) individuals are at stake.
Abimbola’s failure to address these facts, but instead
portray everyone with a prolife persuasion as a religious nutter” doesn’t
fly. You don’t need to have a faith to
recognize the importance of protecting life.
This is a subject that bothers on natural law and as such should imprint
in the conscience of all people whether you are Theist, Atheist or Non-Theist.
One of the world’s most renowned and celebrated Atheist, the late Christopher
Hitchens was known to be very much prolife as with a lot of other people with
no faith. So, let’s get this straight,
Abortion for whatever reason is an intrinsically evil act, faith or no faith.
An unwanted Pregnancy is not the end of the world. There are
families out there prepared to adopt the child and take care of the baby should
the mother be in a position not be able to. I cringed and almost leapt out of
my skin when I read this in her article:
“And to those who make the banal argument of
if-your-parents-did-not-give-birth-to-you-would-you-be-here, I ask in return,
“Since your birth, what good have you done the planet?”
Abimbola, maybe you might not have done any good to the planet,
I for one have and I am sure a lot of others have. While her comment that
“Catholics are already ahead of the Vatican dictates” is about as silly a
statement as you will ever come across. So, because some (very important
qualification) Catholics use
contraception despite the church’s teaching does not in the same vain make Catholics ahead of the Church because some
Catholics ‘lie’ or ‘steal’. To be frank, I am not sure that comment deserved
the dignity of a reply.
And on the question of Maternal Mortality Rate, abortion is
not a medical treatment and there is no evidence to show that it saves
life. It is known in medical parlance
that “Abortion is never medically necessary to save the life of a mother”. On
the other, hand experience has shown that it leaves women in a worse state than
they were before the procedure.
It is important to
clarify that there is no correlation between strict abortion laws and the rate
of maternal mortality (MMR). It, on the other hand, depends on the quality and
accessibility of healthcare to pregnant women. If you look at the chat
(courtesy of the CIA) on maternal mortality rate (MMR) worldwide, you will
notice that countries with poor healthcare system (African countries) top the
chat. Countries like Poland, Malta, Lithuania, Ireland and so many others have
a lower MMR than even the US or UK (with liberal abortion laws) with their very
restrictive abortion laws. Chile with one of the most restrictive abortion laws
in the world has a low MMR (almost comparable to that of the UK and US). Taking
the Chile example, it was noted that the MMR has undergone a tremendous
reduction over the last 50 years, despite the fact that it has continually
tightened its abortion law over the last 25 years. It showed that MMR fell
irrespective of the change in law. I think this is the point Gov. Rochas
Okorocha should reflect on and as with education and other social
infrastructure, healthcare especially for pregnant women (planned or unplanned)
should be of pristine quality and easily accessible.
In the world today there is a momentum and a ground swell of
popular opinion going against the abortion mindset. In the state of Texas
(where Abimbola presently resides) a new law restricting abortion and which
could lead to the closure of a lot of the clinics was recently passed into law.
Anyone who has seen a sonogram or seen when babies struggle
for life during an abortion procedure will never deny the humanity of an unborn
baby. That is why wealthy abortion providers are prepared to fight at any cost
to prevent a change in law that will require women seeking to procure an
abortion to sit through the ultrasound scan of the baby first, to prevent them
having a change of heart. There have been numerous cases of women opting
against having abortion after viewing the ultrasound scan. We know of the case
of Abby Johnson (who herself had 2 abortions in her early 20’s), a planned
parenthood Director in Texas who became prolife when viewing a baby struggle
for life during an abortion procedure. There is also the story of Dr Bernard
Nathanson, a doctor who was known to have carried out more abortion than any
other doctor in his base of Newyork City. He went through a change of heart
when viewing on an ultrasonic scan, the baby he was trying to abort, evade his clinical
equipments. He vowed, from that day, never to carry out an abortion again.
Norma McCorvey, popularly referred by her pseudonym of ‘Jane Roe’ of “Roe vs
Wade”, the infamous supreme court ruling that paved the way for the
legalization of abortion in the US, is now a prolife activist and
unsuccessfully sought to have a judicial review of the 1973 judgment. These
cases are replicate worldwide and are increasingly becoming the norm. This is
the reason why a lot of abortion providers are struggling stop the law from
changing and remain in business. Why would Nigeria then seek to be moving
towards abortion when the rest of the world is trying to move the other way.
Contrary to Abimbola’s belief, opinion polls consistently
show that more women are against abortion than men the world over. In fact a
You-Gov poll conducted last year in the UK showed that 49 per cent of women,
compared to 24 per cent of men, support a reduction in the abortion limit. The “march for life” that is held regularly
around the world is overwhelming dominated my women of all ages.
As an indigene of Imo
State, I would advice Gov. Rochas Okorocha to listen to the voice of his people
and to do away with such dehumanising, vile and obnoxious law. He should strive
to use his mandate to provide for and protect all human life to be best of his
abilities from the “womb to the tomb”. After all he was put there by them to be
their servant as he regularly reminds all in the media.